http://audiblesmirk.wordpress.com/2008/04/08/java-tournament-championship/ Self satisfaction, not happiness, is the goal of life Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:56:30 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 http://audiblesmirk.wordpress.com/2008/04/08/java-tournament-championship/#comment-83 thomaslfowler Fri, 16 May 2008 12:15:40 +0000 http://audiblesmirk.wordpress.com/?p=192#comment-83 Seam isn't a web framework by itself, it has to be used with a framework, which would likely be JSF. I suppose I could have selected a 'JSF stack', like JSF/Facelets/Seam/Ajax4JSF/RichFaces, etc. but I went with entering JSF alone, with the acknowledging that integration libraries are available to carry out tasks not in the spec. Seam isn’t a web framework by itself, it has to be used with a framework, which would likely be JSF. I suppose I could have selected a ‘JSF stack’, like JSF/Facelets/Seam/Ajax4JSF/RichFaces, etc. but I went with entering JSF alone, with the acknowledging that integration libraries are available to carry out tasks not in the spec.

]]> http://audiblesmirk.wordpress.com/2008/04/08/java-tournament-championship/#comment-80 techiexchange Fri, 16 May 2008 09:08:55 +0000 http://audiblesmirk.wordpress.com/?p=192#comment-80 Hi, What about Jboss Seam in this tournament?? Hi,
What about Jboss Seam in this tournament??

]]> http://audiblesmirk.wordpress.com/2008/04/08/java-tournament-championship/#comment-74 thomaslfowler Tue, 13 May 2008 12:21:48 +0000 http://audiblesmirk.wordpress.com/?p=192#comment-74 Hmm, yes and no. The scores are sort of like a modified Pugh matrix (management is familiar with these) where I compared criteria and a judgment comparing the relative strengths of all the criteria. Note that the criteria include documentation and support (published books/materials, user community size, etc), not simply technical merits of the frameworks. Grails I think did come out slightly ahead on technical criteria. Hmm, yes and no. The scores are sort of like a modified Pugh matrix (management is familiar with these) where I compared criteria and a judgment comparing the relative strengths of all the criteria. Note that the criteria include documentation and support (published books/materials, user community size, etc), not simply technical merits of the frameworks. Grails I think did come out slightly ahead on technical criteria.

]]> http://audiblesmirk.wordpress.com/2008/04/08/java-tournament-championship/#comment-72 Joshua Mon, 12 May 2008 07:45:42 +0000 http://audiblesmirk.wordpress.com/?p=192#comment-72 Where did all the numbers came out? Are you making this up? Coz I think Grails is much better than Rails. Where did all the numbers came out? Are you making this up? Coz I think Grails is much better than Rails.

]]>